Reactivity in Chemistry

Migratory Insertion

Part MI2. CO Binding

Migratory insertion involves the transfer of a hydride or alkyl group from a metal to a bound carbon monoxide.  Because this reaction specifically involves bound carbon monoxide, we should take a look at how CO binds to transition metals.  We should begin by reviewing the Lewis structure of carbon monoxide.

Figure MI2.1.  The Lewis structure of carbon monoxide.

Note the lone pair on carbon monoxide.  It is a potential Lewis base or nucleophile.  For a number of reasons, transition metals are almost always electrophiles: they are often positively charged ions, but in general they have an 18-electron octet that is difficult to fill, so they frequently need more electrons.

The donation of an electron pair to a metal cation is shown in figure MI2.2.

Figure MI2.2.  Binding of CO to a metal cation.

Remember, because the 18-electron rule for transition metals makes them electrophilic, the electron pair does not need a positive charge to attract it (figure MI2.3).

Figure MI2.3.  CO binding to a neutral metal atom.

Frequently, the formal charges and lone pairs are not even shown in the transition metal compound, because of the complexity of the picture.

Figure MI2.4.  A more commonly used picture of CO binding leaves out the formal charges.

Note that CO in the context of metal complexes is often referred to as carbonyl.  For example, Cr(CO)6 is called hexacarbonyl chromium.

 

Problem MI2.1.

Draw structures for the following metal carbonyl compounds.  For each compound, indicate

i) the electron count at the metal in the complex (show your work)

ii) the geometry at the metal

a) tetracarbonyl nickel, Ni(CO)4    b)  pentacarbonyl iron, Fe(CO)5    

c)   hexacarbonyl chromium, Cr(CO)6     d) tetracarbonyl cobalt anion, Co(CO)4-

e) tetracarbonyl cobalt hydride, Co(CO)4H

f)  octacarbonyl cobalt, Co2(CO)9 (there is a bond between the two cobalt atoms)

Problem MI2.2.

Draw, with structures and arrows, the equilibrium between pentacarbonyl iron and tetracarbonyl iron, Fe(CO)4 plus carbon monooxide.

 

An important aspect of CO binding is called "back-donation".  In back-donation, not only does the ligand donate electrons to the metal, but the metal also donates to the ligand.  We can think of the CO as donating a pair of electrons from a carbon-based orbital into an empty orbital on the metal, such as a p orbital (figure MI2.5).  The metal has d orbitals that have good symmetry overlap with the pi antibonding orbitals in the CO.  Electron density can be donated from a metal d orbital into the pi* level (figure MI2.6).  Thus, binding to a metal actually weakens the CO bond because a pi* orbital receives electron density from the metal.

Figure MI2.5.  Donation from CO to metal in qualitative molecular orbital terms.

Figure MI2.6.  Donation from metal to CO in qualitative molecular orbital terms.

 

Problem MI2.3.

Draw a Lewis structure that takes into account the effect of metal-to-carbonyl electron donation in tetracarbonyl nickel.

Problem MI2.4.

Infrared spectroscopy is often used to assess bond order between specific atoms within a molecule. Because stretching frequencies are proportional to bond strength, a comparison of frequencies from a bond one molecule to a similar bond in another can give insight into the bond orders in each case.

  1. A C-O bond in organic compounds shows up between 1000-1200 cm-1 in most cases. A C=O bond normally shows up near 1600-1700 cm-1. Explain why these two bonds give rise to two different stretching frequencies.
  2. Based on the Lewis structure, what do you predict for this bond frequency in a CO molecule?
  3. What will happen to the CO stretching frequency in carbon monoxide if the molecule binds to a palladium atom?

Problem MI2.5.

Explain the differences in CO stretching frequencies in the following pairs of compounds.  (Note: the number of peaks is related to molecular symmetry and group theory; focus only on the difference in magnitude of the frequency.)

a)  CO at 2143 cm-1 vs.  Mo(CO)6 at 2004 cm-1.

b)  Ni(CO)4 at 2060 cm-1 vs.  Fe(CO)42- at 1790 cm-1.

c) Cr(CO)6 at 2000 cm-1 vs.  Mn(CO)6+ at 2090 cm-1.

d)  (PF3)Mo(CO)3 at 2055 & 2090 cm-1 vs  (PPh3)Mo(CO)3 at 1835 & 1934 cm-1.

e) Cr(CO)6 at 2000 cm-1 vs.  (C6H5CH3)Cr(CO)3 at 1963 and 1869 cm-1.

Problem MI2.6.

Sometimes, carbonyls can bridge between two metals.  For example, the iron cluster Fe2(CO)9 contains six "terminal" carbonyls, bound to only one iron each, and three "bridging" carbonyls, each of which is bound to both iron atoms.  This complex also features a metal-metal bond.

a) draw a structure for this compound.

b) explain why the terminal carbonyls display stretching frequencies of 2082 and 2019 cm-1, but the bridging carbonyls display a stretching frequency of 1829 cm-1.

 

"Organic" carbonyls, such as aldehydes and ketones, can also bind to transition metals, as you may have seen before.  These compounds bind to transition metals in a very different way than carbon monoxide.  Normally, we think of them as simple lone pair donors.  The oxygen lone pair donates to the metal atom or ion.  The resulting complexes are important because the carbonyl becomes "activated" or ready to accept nucleophiles.

Problem MI2.7.

Draw, with arrows, the coordination of the following organic carbonyl compounds to metal complexes.

a) 2-pentanone with TiCl4.        b)  ethyl acetate with ScCl3.      

c)  propanal with Cp2ZrH2 (Cp = cyclopentadienyl anion, C5H5-).

 

This site is written and maintained by Chris P. Schaller, Ph.D., College of Saint Benedict / Saint John's University (with contributions from other authors as noted).  It is freely available for educational use.

Send corrections to cschaller@csbsju.edu

This material is based upon work supported by the National Science Foundation under Grant No. 1043566.

Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this material are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Science Foundation.

 

 

Navigation:

Back to Insertion Index

Back to Structure & Reactivity Web Materials