Economics 374-01A Dr. John F. Olson
Monetary Theory and Policy Spring 2005
Study Guide for Second Test
The second test (Monday, April 11th) will be on the material from Handa, chapters 10, 2, and 13, as well as the supplementary hand-out provided on the money supply process. (The material from chapter 14 will be shifted to the third test.)
The bulleted points below are from the end of the chapter “Summary of Critical Conclusions” in the Handa text. See/study the appropriate chapter sections of the text for details. I have inserted my annotations (and some potential test questions) in italics.
Chapter 10 – Money Supply Process
The money stock is not
exogenously fixed as is often assumed in basic macroeconomic models to reduce
the complexity of the analytical framework.
The money supply depends upon the behaviors of the public and the
banking system, as well as the direct and indirect influences of the monetary
authorities.
The money supply
process can be expressed analytically as Ms = m x Base. The money multiplier (m) is determined, in
turn, by the currency-deposit and reserve-deposit ratios. See the provided course handout on the money supply process for the
derivation of the expression and further details.
What is fundamental to
understanding the money supply process is its integration with the process of
credit and deposit creation in the banking system. Banks accept deposits, then extend those
funds as new credit (loans and/or acquired securities) which, in turn, becomes
the source of new, additional deposits.
You should be able to
explain how the money supply (and money multiplier) process works in terms of
the economic behavior of the public, banks, and the Federal Reserve, as well as
how their behaviors are determined and affected by changes in economic
variables (interest rates, etc.).
This is measured by the currency-deposit ratio in the money multiplier formula.
This is measured by the reserve-deposit ratio in the money multiplier
formula.
See the Federal Reserve web-pages for each of the three policy tools
linked from http://www.federalreserve.gov/policy.htm. How do changes in each of the tools
subsequently affect (directly and/or indirectly) the monetary base and/or the
money multiplier through the currency-deposit and/or the reserve-deposit ratio?
You can also empirically determine on your own from the course web-site accessible data sets that the currency-deposit and reserve-deposit ratios have been declining over time, which increase the value of the money multiplier.
Refer to the Handa text sections 10.6 and
10.7 and the tables 10. 1 and 10.2 for theory and evidence.
Chapter 2 – Money and Prices
This assertion is the neutrality of money. You should be able to discuss the
perspectives of Fisher, the
The QTM disequilibrium changes are, of course, short-run adjustment
processes in moving to the new long-run equilibrium.
Explain the different concepts or views of the transmission mechanism
(see the final two bulleted conclusions below).
Present and explain the economic reasoning underlying each of the three
Keynesian motives for holding money.
Recall that the classical view assumes there is no money illusion and,
thus, there is the classical dichotomy between the real (commodity markets) and
nominal (money) economies. Money is
primarily a transactions asset with few or no good substitutes.
Chapter 13 – Neoclassical and Classical Models
In this chapter and
the next (14), you are presented with the evolution of macroeconomic thinking
over the past two or more centuries. I
suggest using a compare/contrast approach in studying the material. What is common among the models in their
assumptions about structure and behavior?
What is different? And how does
that yield similar or different conclusions?
There is also the
development and presentation of the IS-LM and AD-AS model(s) with which you
should be familiar from ECON 333. You
should be able to use these tools to appropriately illustrate your
macroeconomic arguments. While the
graphs and/or equations are useful illustrative and/or analytical devices, what
is most important are the underlying economic (conceptual) arguments.
Keynes and his
subsequent followers had different assumptions about the structure and processes
of the macro-economy than the classical and neo-classical approaches; thus,
they reach different conclusions and results.
The IS curve
represents goods market equilibrium, while the LM curve represents money market
equilibrium. (Note: by invoking Walras’
Law, goods market equilibrium simultaneously implies credit –
savings/investment – market equilibrium, and money market equilibrium
simultaneously implies bond market equilibrium.) Combining IS and LM conditions creates an AD
(aggregate demand) curve – a negatively-sloped relationship between the price
level and level of real expenditure (income, GDP demanded) in the economy. To complete the model, an AS (aggregate
supply) curve is constructed to represent the supply-side (factor market equilibrium)
of the economy. Just as there are
differences in views (assumptions) about how the demand-side of the economy
should be modeled, there are differences about the supply-side.
Why is this the case; that is, what
assumptions and reasoning lead to these conclusions? What do flexible prices and wages, the extent
or degree of market competition, and the absence of money illusion have to do
with this?
The natural rate of unemployment exists because of normal amounts of
frictional and structural unemployment – these can change over the long-run as
the demographic composition of the labor force changes, the structure of the
labor market and labor search changes, and as the structural composition of
labor demand and supply change.
Why is the quantity of money neutral; that is, what assumptions and
reasoning lead to these conclusions? See
immediately above as well as in chapter 2 – pure QTM! The implication is that in the long-run,
monetary policy can only affect the price level and the rate of inflation.
Is this “disequilibrium” state just the adjustment phase of going from
one long-run equilibrium to another?
Why and/or how might monetary policy speed the recovery or adjustment to
equilibrium?
What is it in (the assumptions of) the modern classical and new
classical approaches vs. those of traditional classical, neo-classical, and
monetarists that creates this difference regarding the neutrality or
non-neutrality of money?