Structure & Reactivity in Chemistry
Molecular Orbitals
MO11. Geometry and Orbital Contribution to Bonding
What if a molecule had three or more atoms in it? We can no longer draw a simple molecular orbital interaction diagram, in which we show on atom on each side and the molecular results in the middle, because we don't have two atoms coming together to share electrons.
Instead, we look at slightly simplified MO diagrams in which we keep track of the result all those atomic orbitals coming together to make new orbitals. At a very simple level, the qualitative result is always the same and can be roughly predicted based on the Lewis structure.
There is a bonding MO for every bond you see in the Lewis structure. These levels are low on the diagram.
Every bonding MO has a corresponding antibonding MO. These levels are high on the diagram.
Lone pairs in Lewis structure correspond to non-bonding orbitals. These levels are intermediate on the diagram.
The diagram is populated by the same number of electrons that you see in the Lewis structure.
Problem MO11.1.
a) This is the MO diagram for
ethane.
Draw a Lewis structure of ethane.
Populate the electrons into the MO diagram.
b) This is the MO diagram for
propane.
Draw a Lewis structure of propane.
Populate the electrons into the MO diagram.
Add in
the missing MO cartoons for the different levels.
Label the HOMO and LUMO.
c) This is the MO diagram for
butane.
Draw a Lewis structure of butane.
Populate the electrons into the MO diagram.
What happpens
to the MO diagram as the alkane chain length increases?
Problem MO11.2.
a) This is the MO
diagram for ethene.
Draw a Lewis structure of
ethene.
Populate the electrons into the MO diagram.
b) This is the MO diagram
for propene.
Draw a Lewis structure of propene.
Populate the electrons into the MO diagram.
Add in
the missing MO cartoons for the different levels.
Label the HOMO and LUMO.
c) This is the MO diagram
for 1-butene.
Draw a Lewis structure of 1-butene.
Populate the electrons into the MO diagram.
What happpens
to the MO diagram as the alkane chain length increases?
d) This is the MO diagram
for 2-butene.
Draw a Lewis structure of 2-butene.
Populate the electrons into the MO diagram.
Does the
location of the pi bond change the MO diagram?
e) This is the MO diagram
for 1-butyne.
Draw a Lewis structure of 1-butyne.
Populate the electrons into the MO diagram.
How does
an alkyne change the MO diagram?
Methane is a moderately small molecule. Its Lewis structure is pretty easy to draw, with a carbon in the middle bonded to four hydrogens. Trying to find the interactions of the hydrogen 1s orbitals with the orbitals on carbon could be challenging. However, molecular orbital calculations generally start with a good guess at the geometry of the structure.
In quantitative calculations, that starting geometry is often modified after the energy of the molecule has been calculated. A long series of iterative calculations are done, changing bond lengths or bond angles each time, until the geometry with the lowest possible energy has been found. If this geometry has the lowest energy, then it is probably the shape that the molecule would really adopt in nature. In fact, it is assumed in quantum chemistry that if a lower energy structure can be found, it is always a more accurate picture of the real molecule (assuming no mistakes have been made in the calculation).
Since the carbon in methane has four groups attached to it, we can be pretty sure that the carbon is tetrahedral.
We will assume the four hydrogens are arranged at the corners of a tetrahedron around the central carbon. Overlap with the carbon 2s orbital is easy to see, because the s orbital can overlap with neighbours in all directions. Of course, there could be an in-phase combination and an out-of-phase combination.
The complicated part arises when we want to introduce the carbon electrons and have them interact with the hydrogens. There is no universal orientation of p orbitals. Which way should they point?
In principle, it does not matter too much what direction we choose for the p orbitals. We should eventually end up with the same conclusions in the end. However, things may get extremely complicated and mistakes are likely to occur if we don't choose an orientation that makes the interactions simple to see. Since it doesn't matter which way the p orbitals are pointing, we should choose a direction that makes the calculation easiest.
Orienting the p orbitals this way simplifies things a lot. It means each lobe of each p orbital is directed at a space (on the face of a cube) in between two hydrogen atoms (on the opposite corners of the face). The other lobe of the same p orbital is directed at a space (on the opposite face of the cube) in between the other two hydrogen atoms (on the opposite corners of that face). The same is true for each p orbital, but they point at different faces and they interact with different combinations of the same four hydrogens.
As a result of this choice, there are really only a few interactions to consider in methane.
Note that here the hydrogen atoms are often treated as being in phase with each other, or at least pairs of them are. This assumption simplifies the calculation and cuts down on the number of non-allowed combinations (i.e. combinations that produce the total number of orbitals over eight).
Organizing these combinations in terms of energy:
In general, this idea that the geometry around an atom determines what atomic orbitals are needed to form direct (sigma) bonds with its neighbours is closely tied to hybridization. That's the idea that s and p orbitals in the same shell will need to work together to bond to neighbouring atoms. In molecules, we sometimes blur the distinction between the ones that are needed to form this set of bonds, and refer to them instead as "hybrids". Hybridization is closely tied to the geometry of the central atom, so much so that the terms, geometry and hybridization, are occasionally used interchangeably.
- linear geometry corresponds to sp hybridization
- trigonal planar geometry correxponds to sp^{2} hybridization
- tetrahedral geometry corresponds to sp^{3} hybridization
Problem MO11.3.
Construct a molecular orbital picture for borohydride anion, BH_{4}^{-}.
a) Use the geometry for BH_{4}^{-} that you would predict from its Lewis structure.
b) Select an orientation for the p orbitals on boron.
c) What interaction are possible between the set of hydrogens and the boron 2s orbital?
d) What interactions are possible between the set of hydrogens and one boron 2p orbital?
e) What interactions are possible between the set of hydrogens and the second boron 2p orbital?
f) What interactions are possible between the set of hydrogens and the third boron 2p orbital?
g) Can all the hydrogen orbitals interact in each case? If not, why not?
h) Order the resulting combinations in energy, show the resulting energy levels and populate them with the correct number of electrons.
Problem MO11.4.
Construct a molecular orbital picture for borane, BH_{3}.
a) Use the geometry for BH_{3} that you would predict from its Lewis structure.
b) Select an orientation for the p orbitals on boron.
c) What interaction are possible between the set of hydrogens and the boron 2s orbital?
d) What interactions are possible between the set of hydrogens and one boron 2p orbital?
e) What interactions are possible between the set of hydrogens and the second boron 2p orbital?
f) What interactions are possible between the set of hydrogens and the third boron 2p orbital?
g) Can all the hydrogen orbitals interact in each case? If not, why not?
h) Order the resulting combinations in energy, show the resulting energy levels and populate them with the correct number of electrons.
Problem MO11.5.
Based upon your results of the previous two questions about borane and borohydride, comment on the energetics involved in the addition of a hydride ion (H^{-}) to borane to produce borohydride. For this question, just assume the hydride electrons start out at a similar energy to the 2p electrons of boron.
Problem MO11.6.
Construct a molecular orbital picture for carbene, CH_{2}, in two different ways.
a) In one approach, assume the H-C-H forms a 180 degree angle (linear geometry). Only one of the p orbitals lies along this line.
b) In a second approach, assume the H-C-H form a 120 degree angle (angular geometry). These three atoms define a plane. Two of the p orbitals can lie in the plane of these three atoms.
c) Based on your molecular orbital energy level diagrams, which of these two possibilities do you think is most favourable?
This site was written by Chris P. Schaller, Ph.D., College of Saint Benedict / Saint John's University (retired) with other authors as noted on individual pages. It is freely available for educational use.
Structure & Reactivity in Organic, Biological and Inorganic Chemistry by Chris Schaller is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 3.0 Unported License.
Send corrections to cschaller@csbsju.edu
Navigation: