Reactivity in Chemistry
Oxidative Addition
and Reductive Elimination
Problem OA1.1.
a) under an atmosphere of hydrogen gas.
b) under an atmosphere of an inert gas such as nitrogen or argon, especially if there is a way for hydrogen gas to escape.
Problem OA1.2.
Problem OA2.1.
a) Pd(0) to Pd(II) (I and Ph are negative)
b) Rh(I) to Rh(III) (Cl and acyl are negative)
c) Ni(II) to Ni(0) (Methyl and phenyl are negative)
d) Zr(IV) to Zr(II) (Cp, H and Ph are negative)
Problem OA2.2.
Increased steric crowding in the coordination sphere may force two gorups to redcutively eliminate together.
Problem OA3.1.
a) Probably the first step is the hardest (slowest) step, involving bond breaking in the alkyl halide. The donation of the resulting anion to the cation should be pretty fast.
b) Rate = k1 [MLn][CH3Br]
Problem OA3.2.
b) Methanol is more polar than benzene. The acceleration of the reaction in methanol suggests that there is increasing polarity in the transition state, or polar intermediates.
c) Inhibition by iodide ion suggests that iodide is a product of a reversible step during this reaction. Adding iodide pushes that step backward, decreasing the rate of product formation. The mechanism below is consistent with these observations:
Thus reductive elimination occurs as we go from the second to the third intermediate.
Presumably, the increased positive charge (and general decrease in electron density, owing to loss of a ligand) results in reductive elimination because of destabilization of the Pt(IV).
Alternatively, we might suppose that after loss of iodide, the iodide ion donates directly to a phenyl ligand, displacing the platinum as a leaving group in an SN2 reaction. That would lead directly to the product from the first intermediate, which is a simpler route. However, the precedent for aliphatic nucleophilic substitution involves nucleophilic donation to tetrahedral carbons, not to trigonal planar ones. That mechanism is unlikely.
Problem OA3.3.
a) Pt(0) to Pt(II)
b) Changes from (R) to (S)
c) This is an SN2 reaction, so the platinum displaces the bromide from the opposite side.
Problem OA3.4.
In case (a), the reaction appears to be SN2, presumably with complete inversion of configuration from (S) to (R). In case (b), there is probably a competing SN1 pathway because the resulting cation is both benzylic and secondary, so it is pretty stable. On the other hand, if the reaction proceeded entirely through an SN1 pathway, the reaction would result in nearly complete racemization, with 0% ee.
Problem OA3.5.
Problem OA3.6.
Problem OA4.1.
Problem OA4.2.
Concerted oxidative addition is the mechanism that occurs when a polar mechanism (SN2) is not possible. It is sometimes called "cis" oxidative addition. Because the two fragments added to the metal form bonds to the metal at the same time, they must be cis to each other.
By the principle of microscopic reversibility, reductive elimination works the same way. The ligands have to be cis to each other in order to reductively eliminate, unless they are eliminating via a polar mechanism. Since both alkyl groups would have the same charge, a polar mechanism is unlikely.
Both of these platinum(II) complexes are d8 and they would adopt square planar geometry. In the second case, the alkyls would be trans to each other and would be unable to undergo reductive elimination.
Problem OA5.1.
a) homogeneous b) heterogeneous c) heterogeneous d) homogeneous
Problem OA5.2.
Problem OA5.3.
Problem OA5.4.
Problem OA5.5.
Problem OA5.6.
Problem OA5.7.
Problem OA6.1.
Problem OA6.2.
Problem OA6.3.
Problem OA6.4.
Problem OA6.5.
Problem OA6.6.
Problem OA6.7.
Problem OA6.8.
Problem OA6.9.
Problem OA6.10.
This site was written by Chris P. Schaller, Ph.D., College of Saint Benedict / Saint John's University (retired) with other authors as noted). It is freely available for educational use.
Structure & Reactivity in Organic, Biological and Inorganic Chemistry by Chris Schaller is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 3.0 Unported License.
Send corrections to cschaller@csbsju.edu
This material is based upon work supported by the National Science Foundation under Grant No. 1043566.
Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this material are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Science Foundation.
Navigation:
