CHAPTER 7 - CATALYSIS 

E:  RIBOZYMES and the RNA World

BIOCHEMISTRY - DR. JAKUBOWSKI

  04/01/2009

Learning Goals/Objectives for Chapter 7E:  After class and this reading, students will be able to

  • define a ribozyme and describe their known activities;
  • identify, given a reaction mechanism, the types of catalytic mechanisms that occur during ribozyme catalysis;
  • contrast the chemical and physical properties of dsDNA, ssRNA, and proteins and how they may confer on these polymers critical attributes necessary for their biological functions/activities;
  • give reasons that would explain how simple life might have originated using RNA, not DNA and proteins, as both the carrier of genetic information and as biological catalyst.

Ribozymes

Any molecule that displays any of the catalytic motifs seen in the earlier guides (general acid/base catalysis, electrostatic catalysis, nucleophilic catalysis, intramolecular catalysis, transition state stabilization) can be a catalyst.   So far we have examined only protein catalysts.  These can fold to form unique 3D structures which can have active sites with appropriate functional groups or nonprotein "cofactors" (metal ions, vitamin derivatives) that participate in catalysis.   There is nothing special about the ability of proteins to do this.  It is now known that RNA, which can form complicated secondary and tertiary structures as seen in the 3D image of the ribozyme from Tetrahymena thermophila,  can as well. 

Figure:  ribozyme from Tetrahymena thermophila,

RNA molecules that act as enzymes are called ribozymes.  This property of some RNA's was discovered by Sidney Altman and Thomas Czech, who were awarded the Nobel Prize in Chemistry in 1989.   In contrast to protein enzymes which are true catalysts in that they are used over again, this is an example of a single use ribozyme.  Other ribozymes are true catalysts and can carry out RNA slicing by transesterification (splicesome) and peptidyl transfer (in ribosomes).  The  mechanisms of catalysis of  the hepatitis delta virus ribozyme include general acid/base catalysis. 

Figure:   mechanisms of catalysis

The hairpin ribozyme  from satellite RNAs of plant viruses is 50 nucleotides long, and can cleave itself internally, or , in a truncated form, can cleave other RNA strands in a transesterification reaction.  The structure consists of two domains, stem A required for binding (self or other RNA molecules) and stem B, required for catalysis. Self-cleavage in the hairpin ribozyme occurs in stem A between an A and G bases (which are splayed apart) when the 2' OH on the A attacks the phosphorous in the phosphodiester bond connecting A and G to form an pentavalent intermediate. 

Figure:  Self-cleavage in the hairpin ribozyme

Rupert & Ferré-D'Amaré (2001) solved the crystal structure of a hairpin ribozyme with a non-cleavable substrate analog containing a in which a 2'-OCH3 was substituted for the nucleophilic 2'-OH group.   See the applet below.

A recent study by Rupert et al. (2002) shows that A38 in Stem B appears to be able to interact with the products (the cleaved A now in the form of a cyclic phosphodiester with itself) and the departing G, and also with a transition state pentavalent analog of the sessile A-G bond in which the phosphodiester linking A and G in the substrate is replaced with a pentavalent vanadate bridge between A and G.  However, A 38 does not appear to react with the sessile A -G groups in the normal substrate, indicating that the main mechanism used by this ribozyme is transition state binding.  Since RNA molecules have fewer groups available for acid/base and electrostatic catalysis (compared to protein enzymes), ribozymes, presumably the earliest type of biological catalyst, probably make more use of transition state binding as their predominant mode of catalytic activity.

Figure:  Active Site of Hairpin Ribozyme: Transition State Binding

 

Recently, the crystal structure of a purple bacterium group I self-splicing intron (which catalyze the removal of itself) interacting with both exons in a state prior to their ligation was determined (Adams, P. et al.).  The structure shows both exons in close proximity.  Nucleophilic attack of the 3'OH of the 5' exon on a distorted phosphate at the intron-3'-exon junction.    Two metal ions reside on either side of the labile phosphodiester bond at the intron-3'exon junction, and are held in place by 6 phosphates.

A novel use of ribozymes was recently reported by Winkler et. al.  They discovered that the 3' end of the mRNA of the gene glmS (from Gram-positive bacteria) which encodes an amidotransferase (catalyzing the formation of glucosamine-6-phosphate from glutamine and fructose-6-phosphate) is a ribozyme.   A glucosamine-6-phosphate binding site in the ribozyme (3' end of the mRNA) binds this sugar, inducing autocleavage of the ribozyme.  This inhibits, by an uncertain mechanism, the formation of the amidotransferase from the remaining part of the mRNA.  This mechanism of regulation of gene expression through ribozyme activity might prove to be common.

Chime Hammerhead Ribozyme

Chime Self-splicing Group I intron with both exons  Jmol Self-splicing Group I intron with both exons  

 Jmol:   L1 Ligase Ribozyme

The RNA World

Given that RNA expresses catalytic activities and can carry genetic information (some viruses have ds and ss RNA as their genome),  it has been suggested that early life might have been based on RNA.  DNA would evolve later as a more secure carrier of genetic information.  An inspection of chemical properties of DNA, RNA, and proteins shows them to have attributes needed for their expressed function.  Let's examine each for structural features that might be important for function.

a.  Why does DNA lack a 2' OH group (found in RNA), which has been replaced with a hydrogen? This required the evolutionary creation of a new enzyme, ribonucleotide reductase,  to catalyze the replacement of the OH in a ribonucleotide monomer to form the deoxyribonucleotide form.  One possible explanation if offered in the figure below.  DNA, the main carrier of genetic information, must be an extremely stable molecules.  An OH present on C'2 could act as a nucleophile and attack the proximal P in the phosphodiester bond, leading to a nucleophilic substitution reaction and potential cleavage of the link.  RNA, an intermediary molecule, whose concentration (at least as mRNA) should rise and fall based on the need for a potential transcript, should be more labile to such hydrolysis.

b.  Why do both  DNA and RNA contain a phosphodiester link between adjacent monomers instead of more "traditional" links such as carboxylic acid esters, amides, or anhydrides?  One possible explanation is given below.  Nucleophilic attack on the sp3 hybridized P in a phosphodiester is much more difficult than for a more open sp2 hybridized carboxylic acid derivative.  In addition, the negative charge on the O in the phosphodiester link would decrease the likelihood of a nucleophilic attack.  The negative charges on both strands in ds-DNA probably helps keep the strands separated allowing the traditional base pairing and double stranded helical structure observed.

c.  Why is DNA found as a repetitive double-stranded helix but RNA is usually found as a single stranded molecule which can form complicated tertiary structures with some ds-RNA motifs? 

Another reason for the absence of the 2' OH in DNA is that it allows the deoxyribose ring in DNA to pucker in just the right way to sterically allow extended ds-DNA helices (B type).   The pucker in deoxyribose and ribose can be visualized by aligning all the atoms in the ring into a single plane defined by the ring atoms C1', O, and C4'.   If a ring atom is pointing in the same direction as the C4'-C5' bond, the ring atom is defined as endo.  If it is pointing in the opposite direction, it is defined as exo (see Jmol below).  In deoxyribose,  the C2' ring atoms can be either endo or exo.  In normally found ds DNA (B form), C2' is in the endo form.  It can also adopt the C3' endo form, leading to the formation of another less common helix, the ds-A helix.   In contrast, steric interference prevents ribose in RNA from adopting the 2'endo conformation, and allows only the 3'endo form, precluding the occurrences of extended ds-B-RNA helices.

JmolPuckering in ribose and deoxyribose

Jmol Comparison of ds DNA forms  JmolComparison of ds DNA and RNA

Now lets review the kinds of structure adopted by the 3 major macromolecules, DNA, RNA and  proteins.  DNA predominately adopts the classic ds-BDNA structure, although this structure is wound around nucleosomes and "supercoiled" in cells since it must be packed into the nucleus.  This extended helical form arise in part from the significant electrostatic repulsions of two strands of this polyanions (even in the presence of counterions).  Given its high charge density, it is not surprising that it is complexed with positive proteins and does not adopt complex tertiary structures.  RNA, on the other hand, can not form long B-type double-stranded helices (due to steric constraints of the 2'OH and the resulting 3'endo ribose pucker).  Since it doesn't have the same charge density as the double-stranded DNA, it can adopt complex tertiary conformations (albeit with significant counterion binding to stabilize the structure) and in doing so can form regions of secondary structure (ds-A RNA) in the form of stem/hairpin forms.  Proteins, with its combination of polar charged, polar uncharged, and nonpolar side chains have little electrostatic hindrance in the adoption of secondary and tertiary structures.  That RNA and proteins can both adopt tertiary structures with potential binding and catalytic sites makes them ideal catalysts for chemical reactions.  RNA, given its 4 nucleotide motif can clearly also carry genetic information, making it an ideal candidate for the first evolved macromolecules enabling the development of life.  Proteins with a great abundance of organic functionalities would eventually supplant RNA as a better choice for life's catalyst.  DNA, with its greater stability, would supplant RNA as the choice for the main carrier of genetic information.

 

Recent References

  1. Doudna, J. & Lorsch, J. Ribozyme catalysis: Not different, just worse.  Nature Structural and Molecular Biology.  12, pg 395 (2005)
  2. Adams, P. et al. Crystal structure of a self-splicing group I intron with both exons.  Nature. 430, pg 45 (2004)
  3. Winkler, W. et al. Control of gene expression by a natural metabolite-responsive ribozyme.  Nature. 428, pg 281 (2004)
  4. Rupert, P. et al. Transition State Stabilization by a Catalytic RNA. Science, 298, pg 1421 (2002)
  5. Rupert. P. & Ferré-D'Amaré, A.  (2001) Crystal structure of a hairpin ribozyme-inhibitor complex with implications for catalysis. Nature 410, 780-786 (2001)
  6. Doudna and Cech. The chemical Repertoire of Natural Ribozymes. Nature. 418, pg 222 (2002)
  7. Shu-ichi Nakano et al. General Acid-Base Catalysis in the Mechanism of a Hepatitis Delta Virus Ribozyme. 287, 
    Science 287, pg. 1493 (2000)
    Delta Virus Ribozyme
  8. Rupert and Ferre-D'Amare. The Hairpin turn (in ribozymes and their catalytic mechanism).  Nature. 410, pg 761 (2001)
  9. Schultes and Bartel. One Sequence, Two Ribozymes: implications for the emergence of new ribozyme folds.  Science. 289, pg 401, 448 (2000)
  10. Steitz at al. . The ribosome is a ribozyme. Science.  289, pg 878, 905 (2000)
  11. Yean et al. The case for an RNA enzyme (Spliceosome)  Nature. 408. pg 782, 881 (2000)
  12. Perrota et al. Imidazole rescue of a Cytosine mutation in a self-cleaving ribozyme.  Science. 286. pg 61, 123 (2000)
  13. Zhuang et al. A Single-Molecule Study of RNA Catalysis and Folding.  Science. 288, pg 2048 (2000)

Navigation