Interaction Strategies, Action Plans, Meeting Review Forms

Materials from our June Workshop Consultant, Linda Marrin

DiSC® INTERACTION STRATEGIES

Classical Profile Patterns

Creating a Positive Climate

Communicating

Resolving Conflict

DOMINANCE

 
-  Provide choices for activities
-  Accept their need for variety and change
-  Let them direct the efforts of others
-  Offer new opportunities and challenges

 

 
-  Use direct, to-the-point communication without a lot of social chatter
- Check at the end of the discussion to make sure everything was heard

 
A "D" tends to take a direct,
aggressive approach which may result in  "I win/you lose"
-  Avoid right-wrong debates by stating your differences without judgment
-  Use open-ended questions (how, what, where, when) to get to the real issues
- Wrap up the discussion by stating what each person has committed to do to resolve the conflict.

D         Developer
Di        Results-Oriented
DI        Inspirational   
? 
Dc       Creative   
  ? 

INFLUENCE


 -  Provide opportunities to
 interact positively with others
-  Allow time for verbalizing their thoughts, feelings, ideas
-
  Assist them in following up on details
-  Provide enthusiastic, verbal recognition

 

 
- Use informal, open-ended discussions in social environments
- Use two-way dialog, responding to their feelings

 
An "I" tends to avoid direct, open conflict-  Recognize their discomfort with conflict or loss of approval
-  State the issue factually without criticism of them as a person
-  Limit their attempts to minimize the problem or sidetrack the discussion
-  Wrap up the discussion with  clear statement of what is going to happen, by when, and affirm your relationship with them

I          Promoter
Id        Persuader
Is        Counselor
Ic        Appraiser

STEADINESS

 
-  Acknowledge how their efforts are helpful to others-  Provide opportunities to cooperate with others in achieving results
-  When suggesting change, lay out a step-by-step plan

 
Provide regular opportunities for informal, casual discussions
-  Draw out information about their concerns, worries or conflicts with others
- Initiate discussions in a friendly, low-key manner

 
An "S" tends to avoid aggression, hostility or conflict
-  State the need to resolve the conflict in order to maintain stability an harmony
in the relationship
-  Draw out uncomfortable issues by asking open-ended questions, (how, what, where, when)
-  Ask them what they need to resolve the issue in a way that was reasonable and effective
 

S        Specialist
Si       Agent
Sd      Achiever
Sdc     Investigator
Sc      Specialist

CONSCIENTIOUSNESS

 
-  Provide opportunities for them to demonstrate their expertise
- Provide situations where their systematic efforts will contribute to long-term success
-  Accept their need to be "right" and their discomfort with mistakes
 

 
- Use formal communication in new situations, avoiding personal questions
- Use logical, matter-of-fact statements rather than emotional expressions
-  Check for points of disagreement and misunderstanding

 
A "C" tends to initially withdraw from open conflict but may become defensive or aggressive
-  State the issue calmly, logically, factually, citing specific behavior
-  Ask what they need to resolve this conflict on a win-win basis
- Recognize their need to think about the situation before responding by scheduling a time to have a follow-up discussion

C        Objective Thinker
CS      Perfectionist  
? ?
Cis      Practitioner
Cd       Creative   
 ?

Note: You may e-mail  Mark to request an e-mail or hard copy version of this form

_________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

Here is a form which can be used to create Plans of Action.  You may e-mail  Mark to request an e-mail or hard copy version of this form

ACTION PLAN

Team Leader:                                                             Date:

Action Item

Task Owner

Key Players

Resources

Needed

Target Dates

Start       End

Date

Completed

Notes

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Meeting Process Check

Here are two forms which we now use to reflect on the quality of our meetings each time. 
You may e-mail  Mark to request an e-mail or hard copy version of these forms

Please rate today's meeting on the following scale

 5=Great,  4= Good  3=OK  2=Poor   1=Terrible

 Form 1

Category

1

2

3

4

5

This meeting advanced our Mission

 

 

 

 

 

Our pace today was just right

 

 

 

 

 

I had adequate access to air time

 

 

 

 

 

We started at the time we agreed on

 

 

 

 

 

The agenda was clear before we started

 

 

 

 

 

We covered one agenda item at a time

 

 

 

 

 

We maintained the focus of each discussion

 

 

 

 

 

We handled items in a reasonable sequence

 

 

 

 

 

We discussed information clearly and accurately

 

 

 

 

 

 How could we do better?

 

 

Form 2

TEAM PROCESS CHECK

Circle the number on each topic that reflects your rating of the team process.

  

 

ON TRACK

1        2        3        4        5        6        7        8        9        10

 

No agenda or did                                                                                                         Followed the agenda

not follow agenda                                                                                                               - no digression

 

 

PARTICIPATION

1        2        3        4        5        6        7        8        9        10             

A few key members                                                                                                     Everyone contributes

dominate, some not                                                                                                      & is involved in team

participating                                                                                                                           decisions

 

 

LISTENING

  1        2        3        4        5        6        7        8        9        10            

More than 1 person                                                                                                     1 person talks at a

Talks at a time;                                                                                                                     time; clarifying &

Repetitions, interruptions                                                                                                    building of ideas

& side conversations

 

 

LEADERSHIP

1        2        3        4        5        6        7        8        9        10               

No attempts to bring                                                                                                     Team leader & team

team back on track &                                                                                                intervene to keep the

encourage equal                                                                                                               team on track;

participation                                                                                                                       equal participation

 

 

DECISION QUALITY/OBJECTIVES ACHIEVED

1        2        3        4        5        6        7        8        9        10          

Team decisions were                                                                                                        Team expertise &

inferior to individual                                                                                                               decisions were

assessments                                                                                                                  superior to individual

                                                                                                                                                  assessments 

 

INFORMATION SHARED

1        2        3        4        5        6        7        8        9        10            

Poor: Could have sent                                                                            Excellent: Interesting & need

out a memo                                                                                                   to know every bit of it                                                                                                       

FUN

1        2        3        4        5        6        7        8        9        10          

No fun at all                                                                                                                      Fun & exciting!

 

 

 

 

 

Other Pages:

Introduction
Chronology -- From Proposal to New Program  
Proposal to Faculty Committee for Summer Workshops 2005
Interaction Strategies, Action Plans, Meeting Review Forms
Motivations for Changing Our Program Focus
Mission - Vision - Action
Workshop Minutes

Level Three Courses: New Course Descriptions and Goals (Cultural, Literary and Linguistic)
Assessing Literary Interpretation Skills
German Option Form