Interaction Strategies, Action Plans, Meeting Review Forms
Materials from our June Workshop Consultant, Linda Marrin
DiSC® INTERACTION STRATEGIES |
|||
Classical Profile Patterns |
Creating a Positive Climate |
Communicating |
Resolving Conflict |
DOMINANCE |
|
|
|
D
Developer |
|||
INFLUENCE |
|
|
|
I
Promoter |
|||
STEADINESS |
|
|
|
S
Specialist |
|||
CONSCIENTIOUSNESS |
|
|
|
C
Objective Thinker |
Note: You may e-mail Mark to request an e-mail or hard copy version of this form
_________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
Here is a form which can be used to create Plans of Action. You may e-mail Mark to request an e-mail or hard copy version of this form
ACTION PLAN Team Leader: Date: |
||||||
Action Item |
Task Owner |
Key Players |
Resources Needed |
Target Dates Start End |
Date Completed |
Notes |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Meeting Process Check
Here are two forms
which we now use to reflect on the quality of our meetings each time.
You may e-mail Mark to request an
e-mail or hard copy version of these forms
Please rate today's meeting on the following scale
5=Great, 4= Good 3=OK 2=Poor 1=Terrible
Category |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
This meeting advanced our Mission |
|
|
|
|
|
Our pace today was just right |
|
|
|
|
|
I had adequate access to air time |
|
|
|
|
|
We started at the time we agreed on |
|
|
|
|
|
The agenda was clear before we started |
|
|
|
|
|
We covered one agenda item at a time |
|
|
|
|
|
We maintained the focus of each discussion |
|
|
|
|
|
We handled items in a reasonable sequence |
|
|
|
|
|
We discussed information clearly and accurately |
|
|
|
|
|
How could we do better?
Form 2TEAM PROCESS CHECK Circle the number on each topic that reflects your rating of the team process. ON TRACK1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
No agenda or did Followed the agenda not follow agenda - no digression
PARTICIPATION1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 A few key members Everyone contributes dominate, some not & is involved in team participating decisions
LISTENING 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 More than 1 person 1 person talks at a Talks at a time; time; clarifying & Repetitions, interruptions building of ideas & side conversations
LEADERSHIP1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 No attempts to bring Team leader & team team back on track & intervene to keep the encourage equal team on track; participation equal participation
DECISION QUALITY/OBJECTIVES ACHIEVED1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Team decisions were Team expertise & inferior to individual decisions were assessments superior to individual assessments
INFORMATION SHARED1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Poor: Could have sent Excellent: Interesting & need out a memo to know every bit of it FUN1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 No fun at all Fun & exciting!
|
Other Pages:
Introduction
Chronology -- From Proposal to
New Program
Proposal to Faculty Committee for
Summer Workshops 2005
Interaction Strategies, Action Plans, Meeting Review Forms
Motivations for Changing Our Program Focus
Mission - Vision - Action
Workshop Minutes
Level Three Courses: New Course Descriptions and Goals (Cultural, Literary and
Linguistic)
Assessing Literary
Interpretation Skills
German Option Form